esDynamic
Manage your attack workflows in a powerful and collaborative platform.
Expertise Modules
Executable catalog of attacks and techniques.
Infrastructure
Integrate your lab equipment and remotely manage your bench.
Lab equipments
Upgrade your lab with the latest hardware technologies.
Side Channel Attacks
Evaluate cryptography algorithms from data acquitition to result visualisation.
Fault Injection Attacks
Laser, Electromagnetic or Glitch to exploit a physical disruption.
Security Failure Analysis
Explore photoemission and thermal laser stimulation techniques.
Evaluation Lab
Our team is ready to provide expert analysis of your hardware.
Starter Kits
Build know-how via built-in use cases developed on modern chips.
Cybersecurity Training
Grow expertise with hands-on training modules guided by a coach.
esReverse
Static, dynamic and stress testing in a powerful and collaborative platform.
Extension: Intel x86, x64
Dynamic analyses for x86/x64 binaries with dedicated emulation frameworks.
Extension: ARM 32, 64
Dynamic analyses for ARM binaries with dedicated emulation frameworks.
Penetration Testing
Identify and exploit system vulnerabilities in a single platform.
Vulnerability Research
Uncover and address security gaps faster and more efficiently.
Malevolent Code Analysis
Effectively detect and neutralise harmful software.
Digital Forensics
Collaboratively analyse data to ensure thorough investigation.
Software Assessment
Our team is ready to provide expert analysis of your binary code.
Cybersecurity training
Grow expertise with hands-on training modules guided by a coach.
Semiconductor
Security Labs
Governmental agencies
Academics
Why eShard?
Our team
Careers
Youtube
Gitlab
Github
Penetration testing is essentially the βartβ of testing a system or application remotely to find security vulnerabilities, without knowing the inner workings of the target itself, cf.
When people say they need a "pentest", often it really means they want to improve security so they request a pentest because it is a popular practice. But there are a lot of different security practices, or better put, security operations. Let's look at some of the most popular ones:
As you can see, there are really a lot of different things you can do but surely you can't use them all, isnβt it just too much to do?
Β
Actually, you can and should use all of them effectively by spreading them evenly all through the development lifecycle. First comes secure design and threat modeling before product development, then adding scanners into pipeline and code reviews, later after product release you start pentests, audits/compliance, hardening, and finally bug bounties.
The problem is that in real life, security is often an afterthought in software development. Companies often lack resources and experience to provide secure solutions, and that is why they seek support from specialized parties - this is the root of the popularity of pentests, security scanners, obfuscators and bug bounty. That is because all of these can be done by a third party AFTER you already have a working - and maybe even commercially successful product or service.
But don't be fooled - the earlier you take action the better value you get. Those early security considerations in design and safe pipelines, updates checks and security policies give out so much more value-for-money and often can be done in-house without hiring external specialists.
In case you don't actually have a DevSecOps approach implemented, you still have IT infrastructure and deployment. So while code review might be not so relevant, other things do matter. For example, security design decisions exist: even if you did not consciously approve and took any of those, somebody had to. It may be IT personnel or a third party who set up a website or your corporate network. And if you are able to do it consciously and in an accountable manner, you will quickly improve your security posture.
To quote OWASP on this matter:
There is No Silver Bullet - While it is tempting to think that a security scanner or application firewall will provide many defenses against attack or identify a multitude of problems, in reality there is no silver bullet to the problem of insecure software. Application security assessment software, while useful as a first pass to find low-hanging fruit, is generally immature and ineffective at in-depth assessment or providing adequate test coverage. Remember that security is a process and not a product.
Β
In this regard, pentest is only a part of security operations and exists for specialized purposes. This purpose, if put very narrowly, is to answer the question βHow an actual malicious actor would attack this system and how much damage their actions can bring?β
In order to achieve this, we step in as an attacker, using the same set of tools and techniques that an actual attacker would use to target the system. The effects that an attack creates in a system - average load, defensive and response of an alerting system, trace in logs - all of it is similar to real attack.
Β
As you can see, the goals of a penetration testing can be uncomfortably narrow in purpose and as I said in the beginning people often don't actually need a pentest, they want to secure their systems.
That is why eShard often tries to create a personalized solution which fits those customer needs - to combine pentest with design overview, risk assessment, etc. We provide a wide range of security support, help people with secure design and reviewing their policies, perform specialized training to help our customers, provide support on vulnerability mitigations, prepare hardening and operation recommendations.
Contact us to know more.